The Unfed Mind: Unravelling the Philosophy of Mind Over Matter

Gore Vidal’s quote, “The unfed mind devours itself,” appears in his essay "French Letters: Theories of the New Novel," published in 1973 in The New York Review of Books. In it, he highlights how certain narratives both reflect and impact society’s ideals, analyzing literature’s development alongside cultural and political shifts.

Let’s start by unpacking Vidal’s quote, piece by piece, to grasp its full meaning. “The unfed mind” suggests a mind lacking stimulation or engagement. Then, “devours itself” doesn’t conjure an image of a literal mind consuming itself—that would be grotesque and absurd, wouldn’t it? Instead, he’s describing a restless mind that begins to turn inward, creating negative and self-destructive thoughts. In short, “The unfed mind devours itself” reflects how a mind without stimulation can spiral into self-destructive contemplation.

The concept of an unfed mind is not new, and one can see a reflection of this in literature. Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment offers a clear example. Raskolnikov, trapped in his own mind, overanalyzes everything around him, leading him to commit a crime in the misguided belief that he can transcend moral boundaries. His obsession with his intellectual ideas sends him into isolation, and he becomes consumed by guilt and paranoia. In this way, we see how a mind left to turn inward without external stimulation can spiral into chaos, much like Vidal suggests.

His quote speaks to a common, almost universal, sense of restlessness that arises when we’re left without something to occupy the mind. For many, this need for engagement is a response to rigorous demands, like those found in structured academic environments, or simply a way to ward off the mental drift that inactivity often brings. With hobbies, side projects, or even a book in hand, the mind finds a safe means for its energy—preventing what Vidal aptly described as “devouring itself,” a chaos that feels far more intense than it may appear from the outside.

This drive for constant mental engagement aligns with a broader perspective on the mind’s influence over our reality. “Mind over Matter,” as defined by the Cambridge Dictionary, captures this concept as “the power of the mind to control and influence the body and the physical world.” This notion implies that our mental states can profoundly shape our physical experience, raising the question: how does this actually work? It’s a question that invites exploration, offering insights rather than absolute answers, and leaves room for each of us to consider its impact on our own lives.

So, how exactly can we explain “mind over matter”? It’s quite straightforward. Consider top athletes who persevere through fatigue, setting personal records despite physical discomfort, or phobics who fight to remain composed under pressure. Mountaineers who withstand extreme cold and tiredness by using both mental and physical endurance are a fantastic example. In these situations, their mentality takes precedence over their physical constraints. Accordingly, “mind over matter” ties into broader philosophical ideas, such as Descartes's “Substance Dualism” and the original “Mind-Body Problem.” Now, let’s take a step back and examine this entire theory from a telescopic perspective rather than focusing on the minutiae. Generally speaking, when people find themselves idling, the mind can often spiral into chaos, leading to feelings of anxiety and unease—something many find deeply unsettling.

In moments of stillness, we’re likely confronted with the vastness of our own minds, where thoughts, fears, and insecurities swirl together. When we stay busy, our focus naturally shifts to tasks and distractions, but in pausing, it’s as if the floodgates open. We move beyond the present moment and find ourselves navigating an endless sea of “what-ifs” and past regrets. This sudden rush of mental noise can feel disorienting like wandering through a starry sky, lost and without a clear path forward. As Nietzsche poignantly observed, “He who has a why to live can bear almost any how.”

It’s all too easy to stay nestled in comfort zones, continuously feeding our minds familiar information to sidestep the unnerving prospect of change. After all, doesn’t the mere acknowledgement of “change” often spark fear in many? While some thrive on transformation, many find comfort in the security of the known. This preference for the familiar creates a paradox: though the mind craves stimulation, we often retreat from the uncertainty that change inevitably brings.

People often get caught up in routines—what drives this tendency? Is it a fear of change or simply a reluctance to step outside familiar comfort zones? These questions mirror the mental patterns that René Descartes, the French philosopher and scientist, explores in his conception of Substance Dualism, a theory suggesting that the mind and body exist in separate realms.

Dualists in the philosophy of mind emphasize the radical distinction between mind and matter. Substance dualists, in particular, argue that the mind is a thinking entity, fundamentally different from physical objects and devoid of their ordinary characteristics. They typically contend that the body is composed of various substances, further highlighting the separation between the mental and the physical. 

This concept was first articulated in Descartes's philosophical work, Meditations. In the Sixth Meditation, he characterizes the mind as a thinking entity, distinguishing it from an extended thing. He defines the body as an extended substance that does not possess thought, stating, “But what then am I? A thing that thinks. What is that? A thing that doubts, understands, affirms, denies, wills, refuses, and which also imagines and senses.” Descartes, then, clearly embraced a form of interactionism, positing that physical events can sometimes trigger mental events, just as mental events can occasionally lead to physical changes.

In essence, Descartes emphasized the importance of mental engagement in shaping reality. This idea aligns with the belief that mental states profoundly influence physical experiences and vice versa—a core principle behind “mind over matter.” Neglecting to nourish the mind and remaining stagnant in familiar thoughts can suppress the very faculties that define humanity: the capacity to reason, to feel, and to grow.

Without nurturing the mind, there’s a risk of winding into self-doubt and anxiety, much like the disconnection Descartes describes between our thinking selves and physical bodies. This raises an interesting point: Is the focus of the piece on the importance of examining our thoughts, or is it suggesting that filling our lives with engaging activities, which distract us from ourselves, is the key to well-being? It's worth reflecting on. Actively engaging with our inner lives allows a stronger connection to our external realities, fostering a sense of balance and wholeness. And ultimately, isn’t that something we all seek?

Perhaps. 

In today’s digital age, many fall into a cycle where social media demands constant self-presentation, encouraging endless self-reflection and comparison. Rather than fueling creativity, these platforms often deepen feelings of inadequacy and self-doubt. The constant need for validation and the pursuit of an idealized self can quickly lead to the kind of self-consuming mindset Vidal warns about.

Naturally, to prevent our minds from consuming themselves, we must challenge ourselves to break free from the confines of the familiar. Otherwise, we risk becoming lost in an unexamined existence. Considering René’s views opens up the possibility for human souls, typically understood as immaterial entities, it also allows us to grasp the dynamic interplay between our mental states and physical existence, indicating that our thoughts and feelings can profoundly shape our perceptions and experiences of reality.

By acknowledging our reality, it becomes clear that everything we feel and everything we feed into our minds and bodies is real—and that, for better or worse, we hold the reins over it all. With this power, the question arises: why would we misuse it? We possess the free will to decide how we treat ourselves, and unless there is a compelling reason to do otherwise, why wouldn’t we choose to treat ourselves with the same kindness and respect we seek from others?

At its core, substance dualism is a particular perspective within the larger conversation about the mind-body problem. This overarching issue includes a range of theories and inquiries about the nature of our mental and physical selves and how they relate to one another. Essentially, it focuses on the connection between our mental experiences—like thoughts and feelings—and our physical reality, including our brains and bodies. This raises important questions about how these two aspects of our existence interact and influence one another.

This again highlights the complexities of the interaction between mind and matter, suggesting that neglecting our mental well-being can result in a disordered state of being. As befittingly captured by Vidal’s observation, “The unfed mind devours itself.”

By maintaining a Dualist perspective on the mind and body, we recognize the complexity of their relationship and the effort required to enhance our mental faculties for a better life. Acknowledging that our thoughts significantly shape our reality—not just as mere reflections—empowers us to take control and initiate meaningful changes. It allows us to fall into inertia not only leads to stagnation but also invites mental chaos, as Vidal warns. We could choose to remain idle as worry or despair takes hold, but as we’ve figured out the only thing that stifles the mind is… the mind. Ultimately, the pursuit of a balanced existence hinges on our willingness to confront discomfort and strive for self-improvement.

In a world where perceptions can skew reality, the question is not whether to indulge in switching worlds, but whether we need to stimulate our minds enough to do so. So, will we choose to engage our minds, or will we remain passive observers in this chaotic world? It is a question that fundamentally changes who we are, and answering it gives us tremendous power.

So as we’ve seen, the unfed mind can lead to destructive outcomes—whether through existential angst, the dangers of excessive self-reflection, or the withdrawal into comfort zones. But, as Raskolnikov discovered in Crime and Punishment, neglecting the mind is a dangerous path. Today, we are faced with similar challenges. In an age of constant distractions and self-reflection, the question remains: Are we feeding our minds with ideas, experiences, and challenges that push us forward? Or are we trapped in a cycle of passive consumption, waiting for the world to fill the void for us? The power to nourish the mind lies within us, but the choice is ours.

---

Glossary:

Skew - make biased or distorted in a way that is regarded as inaccurate, unfair, or misleading.

---